Sylmar Hang Gliding Association Forum Index Sylmar Hang Gliding Association
Get High...Go Far...Tell Us About It
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Info on the Candidates for Region 3

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Sylmar Hang Gliding Association Forum Index -> Politics of flying
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
chadness



Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 170
Location: Simi Valley, CA

PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2016 7:40 am    Post subject: Info on the Candidates for Region 3 Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

All I see is a write up on Pete Michelmore, who is not running. Anybody have any info or thoughts on Dan DeWeese versus Chris Grantham? Should we all write-in Ken?Smile?

Thanks, Chad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JD



Joined: 25 Apr 2008
Posts: 1670

PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2016 8:22 am    Post subject: Re: Info on the Candidates for Region 3 Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

chadness wrote:
All I see is a write up on Pete Michelmore, who is not running. Anybody have any info or thoughts on Dan DeWeese versus Chris Grantham? Should we all write-in Ken?Smile?

Thanks, Chad

Ken's already an RD.
I voted for Dan DeWeese because he is impartial and does not have a potential conflict of interest by running one major Santa Barbara PG school in direct competition with another major PG school. Dan has been an RD in the recent past and did a good job when there were some critical issues to be dealt with. The long-term outcomes of Dan's decisions were positive to both the region and the various individuals involved. Dan is not heavy handed by any means. I think it's no secret that free-flight pilots need to be treated like independent-minded adults and not children. Dan does an admirable job in this respect.

If Dan wasn't running I wouldn't hesitate to vote for Chris. He's a good guy and very safety minded. But the potential conflict mentioned above gives me pause. Feel free to call or write to both candidates and get their own views. This has been my 2p worth.
DQ
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bob Kuczewski



Joined: 06 Jul 2009
Posts: 575
Location: San Diego

PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2016 7:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

I would vote for Dan. Having said that, I'd like to hear from NME what Dan did (or even tried to do) on the board in his first term that wouldn't have been done anyway by an empty seat.

USHPA is run by the EC. Most of the other directors go along for the ride. That doesn't make them bad people, but they can't fix the problems (like the recent loss of insurability) if they don't have a backbone in the board room.

I'd like to believe that Dan looks back with disappointment on his first term, and now realizes that going along to get along at USHPA has brought the association to the brink of extinction. I would like to think that he'll be more aggressive in standing up for what's right.

Only time will tell, but he's a good enough man to deserve another shot at fixing the core problems.
_________________
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: USHGRS
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Sylmar Hang Gliding Association Forum Index -> Politics of flying All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group