Sylmar Hang Gliding Association Forum Index Sylmar Hang Gliding Association
Get High...Go Far...Tell Us About It
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Over Regulation: FAA? DMV? ... or USHPA?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Sylmar Hang Gliding Association Forum Index -> Politics of flying
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bob Kuczewski



Joined: 06 Jul 2009
Posts: 577
Location: San Diego

PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 2:12 pm    Post subject: Over Regulation: FAA? DMV? ... or USHPA? Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

Sometimes things that should be obvious take a little while to sink in ...

We like to think that our sports of hang gliding and paragliding are less regulated than general aviation or even driving on our streets. But is that really true?

- Could you lose your driver's license for publicly criticizing the DMV? No.
- Could you lose your FAA pilot's license for publicly criticizing the FAA? No.
- Could you lose your USHPA "license" for publicly criticizing USHPA? Sadly, yes.

- Could you lose your driver's license for testifying in court against another driver? No.
- Could you lose your FAA pilot's license for testifying in court against another pilot? No.
- Could you lose your USHPA "license" for testifying in court against another USHPA member? Sadly, yes.

- Could you lose your driver's license for testifying in court against a driving school? No.
- Could you lose your FAA pilot's license for testifying in court against a flight school? No.
- Could you lose your USHPA "license" for publicly testifying in court against a paragliding school? Sadly, yes.

- Could you lose your driver's license for speaking before your local City Council? No.
- Could you lose your FAA pilot's license for speaking before your local City Council? No.
- Could you lose your USHPA "license" for speaking before your local City Council? Sadly, yes.

The only clause that USHPA (and now Ken Andrews) can slimly try to use to justify my expulsion is this one:

"engaged in conduct materially and seriously prejudicial to the purpose and interests of USHPA"

If you think about that, it's essentially a "loyalty" oath. Even if USHPA does something very very wrong, we are bound by that clause to not oppose them or risk expulsion. Neither the FAA nor the DMV have such a clause. That is essentially an "anti-whistle-blower" clause and it helps explain why USHPA has been unable to correct its problems in both safety and politics ... not to mention insurance.

That clause should be repealed and it should NEVER be used as a basis for expulsion of any pilot.
_________________
Join a National Hang Gliding Organization: US Hawks at ushawks.org
View my rating at: USHGRS
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Sylmar Hang Gliding Association Forum Index -> Politics of flying All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group