R/C Aircraft flown in the LZ can present a hazard

Please tell what happened and how it might have been avoided. Names should be ommitted. This forum should help others learn from mistakes that caused or nearly caused a mishap.
jdevorak
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 8:37 am
Location: Kagel LZ

Post by jdevorak »

In that there is endless debate in this club and nothing is ever done until some member steps up to the plate, I have taken on the resolution of this particular problem. At my own expense I have hired Agent Walker to fix the problem. There is no need for new rules. He can’t read anyway. Sunday, his first day on the job, he took out two of the pesky buggers without breaking a pant. The owners spent a half hour revitalizing their planes and he got them again within seconds. He is very persistent. Neither is he influenced by politics. He will stand up to the president as well as the lowly electrician. The only downside is that we have to find something else to do when it’s not flyable and before the wife calls. :roll:
eat right, exercise, die anyway!
User avatar
Steve90266
Posts: 488
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:05 pm
Location: Manhattan Beach
Contact:

RC Aircraft

Post by Steve90266 »

:P :D :)
Steve Murillo
User avatar
skygeek AKA Seabass
Posts: 252
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: Newhall
Contact:

Post by skygeek AKA Seabass »

I say we get a potato launcher take out the planes first then the pilots for the fun of it but leave the dog for questioning.
User avatar
BudRob
Posts: 365
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 6:40 pm

Post by BudRob »

Steve,

I am fine with adding your first 3 guidlines (not rules) and tossing out old guidline #1. Old guildline numbers 2 and 3 were put there because of sensitive neighbors in the houses immediately west of our approach. Because this condition still exists, we should also modify your guildline stating allowable times to start at 9 am, not sunrise, out of consideration for our neighbors.

I know this makes for a lot of guidlines but there are good reasons for all; and nobody HAS to enforce them becuase they are not rules. A gentle reminder of the "guidlines" is all anyone should need as we do forget sometimes.
User avatar
JD
Posts: 1682
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:05 am

Post by JD »

BudRob wrote:....I know this makes for a lot of guidlines but there are good reasons for all; and nobody HAS to enforce them becuase they are not rules....
I'm all for guidelines over rules. The sport thrives on self-regulation, cooperation and above all: Common Sense.
jcflies
Posts: 646
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:32 am

Post by jcflies »

yes, indeed! kill the rules. allow right-minded reasonable men the chance to self-regulate with guidelines...
the free-est sport in the world deserves to END if it bogs itself down with RULES and REGULATIONS! Irony 101!!!
janyce

"You HAVE to make it..."
User avatar
Don
Posts: 512
Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 8:58 am

Rules vs. Common Sense

Post by Don »

There are "Rules" aka LAWs because "Common Sense" isn't very common.
User avatar
gregangsten
Posts: 502
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 11:22 am
Location: Westchester

clearances

Post by gregangsten »

How about dropping the 1/4 mile part which seems unnecessary and just leave it at 500 ft. AGL.
User avatar
Steve90266
Posts: 488
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:05 pm
Location: Manhattan Beach
Contact:

R/C Aircraft

Post by Steve90266 »

All good thoughts. I'll keep the floor open for another week or so, then we'll draw this debate to a close. Thanks, everyone.
Steve Murillo
User avatar
dhmartens
Posts: 938
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:36 am
Location: Reseda

Post by dhmartens »

Possibly the powered harnesses should be allowed to land here quietly. It never made sense to me why they couldn't.
Post Reply