Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 3:01 pm
The USHPA is made up of all of us who choose to participate, a group of people who believe it's in our interest to act as one. Apparently, most of us believe that those we elected are doing a pretty good job, otherwise, we'd be flocking to another organization that does more than offer a forum for the disenfranchised.
Just as enough of those members (in our area) once thought it was in their best interest to find a new representative and acted upon that, I would posit that most members familiar with this issue (all members at the time of the expulsion were notified) find no good reason to support a change in the status quo.
However, you continue to attack Ken Andrews as if only your interest matters. I for one, would not vote for Ken again, if he decided to unilaterally take up this issue. My guess is that he's not fielding a lot of requests from members in your favor. He's too moral to accept his responsibilities as our director and not act on our wishes, if we made them known.
So, your problem is not with Ken. It is with all members who either:
1) don't support your behavior,
2) don't care about the issue or
3) are ignorant of your plight.
Have you considered why the first two could possibly be true, after all that you have self-documented?
I believe a professional public relations entity would be your best course of action, rather than continuing to fill our small club's forum with stale reminders off how awful we've all (USHPA members) treated you.
Just as enough of those members (in our area) once thought it was in their best interest to find a new representative and acted upon that, I would posit that most members familiar with this issue (all members at the time of the expulsion were notified) find no good reason to support a change in the status quo.
However, you continue to attack Ken Andrews as if only your interest matters. I for one, would not vote for Ken again, if he decided to unilaterally take up this issue. My guess is that he's not fielding a lot of requests from members in your favor. He's too moral to accept his responsibilities as our director and not act on our wishes, if we made them known.
So, your problem is not with Ken. It is with all members who either:
1) don't support your behavior,
2) don't care about the issue or
3) are ignorant of your plight.
Have you considered why the first two could possibly be true, after all that you have self-documented?
I believe a professional public relations entity would be your best course of action, rather than continuing to fill our small club's forum with stale reminders off how awful we've all (USHPA members) treated you.