Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What happened to the existing (“old”) forum posts? #2060
    Doug Martens
    Full Member

    Last use of the stargate before Newsome entrance is disclosed, Modi offers shutdown avoidance for $200 billion in Citizen only Obamacare payments to states.

    download

    in reply to: What happened to the existing (“old”) forum posts? #2059
    Doug Martens
    Full Member

    Another post that was banned:

    Patton needed clear skies to attack

    in reply to: What happened to the existing (“old”) forum posts? #2058
    Doug Martens
    Full Member

    BobK originally started this post so lets take a look: fred waugh spider man, ushpa cancel culture has removed him from existance. NOT

    fred waugh spider man

    gettyimages-476459552-612x612

    in reply to: What happened to the existing (“old”) forum posts? #2053
    Doug Martens
    Full Member

    Hang glider Dacron found on Mars, Newsome deflects by provideing news.

    Since I pay all my dues and BobK likes me I will edit and post carbon fiber has also been detected on Mars. Finally notice we do not disclose Stargate info when HG/PG info is more important.

    in reply to: What happened to the existing (“old”) forum posts? #2034
    Doug Martens
    Full Member

    BobK has restored me as his top general. BobK is assuming control of USHPA and all North American assets. We will show you how Gavin Newsome is accessing the Sylamr Star Gate at a later date as this helps his electability.  I can show y0u how BobK can interract with the AI to accomplish hang gliding goals.

    in reply to: What happened to the existing (“old”) forum posts? #2031
    Doug Martens
    Full Member

    ASK AI: Would the landmark staus protect it(SHGA) from having a highspeed rail tunnel built underneth the park, and stop a converyer belt from being built throught the flight park to remove sediment from the pacoima dam?

    Landmark status for the Sylmar Hang Gliding Flightpark would not necessarily block a high-speed rail tunnel or a conveyor belt for dam sediment removal. While designation adds a layer of review and consideration for historic resources, it does not provide absolute protection against major public infrastructure projects.
    Here is a breakdown of how such a situation would likely play out:

    High-speed rail tunnel
    No absolute protection: The government can still exercise its power of eminent domain to acquire private property for public use, even if that property has a historic designation. For an underground tunnel, the process is even more complex, but the potential for the project to proceed remains.
    Environmental review: A landmark designation would trigger a more rigorous environmental review process under state laws like the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The California High-Speed Rail Authority would have to analyze and disclose the potential impact of the tunnel on the flight park’s historic value, setting, and associated flying culture.

    Mitigation, not prevention: The environmental review would focus on avoiding or reducing harm, which could lead to project adjustments. For example, the rail authority might consider alternate tunnel routes, construction techniques to minimize surface disruption, or compensatory mitigation measures. It is unlikely to halt the project completely.
    Past precedents: The California High-Speed Rail project has already faced legal challenges regarding environmental impacts and land acquisition, but these have mainly caused delays and cost increases rather than outright cancellations.

    Conveyor belt for dam sediment removal

    Project specifics matter: The impact of a conveyor belt would heavily depend on its proposed route and construction impact. A project like the one near the Pacoima Wash could require the temporary closure of the flight park, affecting its function and integrity.
    Negotiation and avoidance: A landmark designation would strengthen the Sylmar Hang Gliding Association’s position in negotiations with the public works agency. The agency would be required to consider less harmful alternatives and might agree to mitigation measures that minimize the project’s duration or surface footprint within the park.
    Federal vs. local status: The level of protection would depend on the type of landmark designation.Local designation (City of L.A.): This would trigger a review process at the local level, ensuring the project’s impact is considered, but it provides less leverage against state or federal projects.
    National Register of Historic Places (federal): While it does not prevent a public project, federal funding or permits would trigger a “Section 106” review, requiring consultation with the State Historic Preservation Office to mitigate adverse effects.

    In summary, while landmark status would not provide an absolute shield against these projects, it would be a powerful tool for forcing public agencies to acknowledge the Flightpark’s historic significance, engage in a more thorough environmental review, and consider alternatives that minimize disruption.

    in reply to: What happened to the existing (“old”) forum posts? #2005
    Doug Martens
    Full Member

    The 5 foot hang glider movement existed in 1961.

    in reply to: What happened to the existing (“old”) forum posts? #2001
    Doug Martens
    Full Member

    Drug cartells assainated my wife with a rattle  snake she survived, destroyed my shoulder using sheep to alterlandscape before wind storm, I am enriching uranium in response.

    in reply to: What happened to the existing (“old”) forum posts? #1999
    Doug Martens
    Full Member

    Greblo ghosted me shortly after Russia invaded Ukarine and he interviewed me at the flightpark.

    He disregarded my family lived in Germany to use tactical nukes to protect Europe.

    The biggest mistake of his career as I have video evidence while he was flying Sylmar in 1973.

    note igstadt is far enough from Ramstein if it is nuked.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVv02c3F1J8

    in reply to: What happened to the existing (“old”) forum posts? #1994
    Doug Martens
    Full Member

    Accident avoided, A hang gliding sheep lands out and is nearly eaten by a carnivorous plant.

     

    in reply to: What happened to the existing (“old”) forum posts? #1987
    Doug Martens
    Full Member

    Blocking the Bullet Train through Sylmar for a reason, notime to recalibrate.

    in reply to: What happened to the existing (“old”) forum posts? #1966
    Doug Martens
    Full Member

    It is possible a US EU hang glider/Paraglider tariff could end up at zero percent.

    in reply to: What happened to the existing (“old”) forum posts? #1946
    Doug Martens
    Full Member

    This is the only link I have been granted access to at ushawks.org

    https://mt7.ca/

    Reporting earlybefore investigation complete. BobK may have flown a stargate mission.

    Could possibly become as US Ushpa site.

    in reply to: What happened to the existing (“old”) forum posts? #1942
    Doug Martens
    Full Member

    No bothans were injured in obtaining the plans for the telescopic hang glider.

    [5 foot hang glider movement]

     

    in reply to: What happened to the existing (“old”) forum posts? #1941
    Doug Martens
    Full Member

    BobK and I may have a peace treaty, BobK will run SHGA, BobK wants 5 foot movement plans, https://youtu.be/cu7AWzHuiJI?si=egCXyGnH3spZHEfu