Is letting BobK control my ai infrastruture a good idea?
Re: La Jolla Town Council Endorses Reforms at Torrey PinesPostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2026 9:39 am
Contributor
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:40 pm
Posts: 8963
Location: San Diego, CA
dhmartens wrote:
The Low Death Rate of the flight school also satisfies a requirement.

Where do you get your information about the death rate at the Torrey Pines Gliderport?
I pay for Grok and he responds to your inquiry: The “low death rate” talking point you just got from the official FlyTorrey website is pure operator marketing, not independent data.They claim “less than 1 accident per 10 years or 100,000 flights” and “nearly 100 times safer than the second closest operator.” Those numbers come straight from the people who hold the city concession and make money from every tandem and lesson. There is no public, audited, third-party dataset that verifies them. USHPA accident reports stay internal. NTSB doesn’t routinely investigate Part 103 ultralights. The operator investigates itself and then issues press statements calling the site “amongst the world’s safest.”Meanwhile, the public record is clear: Multiple fatal crashes have occurred under the current management regime (1996 prototype test, 1998 instructor, 2012 experienced pilot into the cliff, 2019 mid-air collision that killed two).
The 2012 fatality was the subject of sworn testimony that safety practices and site control contributed to the risk.
Cliffside operations continue with minimal external oversight precisely because the City of San Diego has deferred almost entirely to the concessioner and a self-regulating association.

When the people who control access, training, and the narrative also control the “safety record” they publish, the claim is self-serving by definition. “We average less than one accident per 100,000 flights” is not a verified statistic; it is a sales pitch. Anyone evaluating risk at Torrey Pines should treat the operator’s FAQs the same way they treat any other commercial brochure: with skepticism until independent data appears.Bob Kuczewski has repeatedly documented the gap between the marketing and the reality on the ground. The low-death-rate claim does not survive that scrutiny.That is the adversarial position.

EDIT: Concise mission statement in Bob Kuczewski’s voice:“We need the flying motorcycle because personal flight belongs to pilots, not bureaucracies. A simple geared-prop hang-glider bike puts real, low-cost freedom back in the hands of ordinary people—exactly what recreational hang gliding was meant to be—while billion-dollar high-speed rail and over-regulated commercial sites keep locking the sky behind money, rules, and self-serving safety claims. Build it, fly it, and keep the air free.”

In love with Choppergirl will jepordise Ushpa and rrg so Turn Me Loose.

I feel brain dead after fighting this underground band I finally got him to change his name after I uncovered his entire operation, from “Syntax” to ‘Theevacuationplan”. It takes getting used to but hes really quite talented. I verified there is no hatespeech in his Grindcore. Taking steps to return to hang gliding.

Greblo Trained me well I am on top of it https://www.youtube.com/shorts/L_3PxbJpypE

He basically said he is going to sue me to take my identity so I am issuing a warning to ushpa and shga he is using uspto to attack me as a private Equity takeover. Here is hang gliding risk areas and an interview with him.
https://www.willswing.com/ip-notice/
Trademarks
“Wills Wing” and the Wills Wing logo are trademarks of Steven Pearson and Michael W. Meier. The following product names are also trademarks:

Hang gliders: T3, T2, T2C, U2, U2C, Sport 3, Sport 2, Falcon 4, Falcon 3, Falcon 2, Falcon 1, Falcon 225, Falcon 195, Falcon 170, Falcon 4 Tandem, Falcon 3 Tandem, Alpha, Condor, Monarch, Ultrasport, Supersport, HP, Talon, Duck, Ram Air

Harnesses: Z5, Z-One, FlyLite, FlyLite 3, Covert

These marks may not be used without written permission except for purposes of factual reference (e.g., identifying a product by its trademarked name in a review, classified ad, or article).

This month alone my uspto credit card bill is $750 the last 2 months $1550

Emergency warning do not enter into a phone conversation, only use written email, this is a propity warning:Yes, Texas law allows you to record phone conversations, but it must be done within specific legal boundaries.Here are the key points you need to know about recording calls in Texas:One-Party Consent Rule: Texas is a “one-party consent” state. This means that as long as at least one person participating in the conversation agrees to the recording, it is legal. If you are a party to the phone call and are recording it, you are the consenting party.Consent from Others: You do not need to inform the other person that you are recording the call, provided you are a participant. If you are not a participant in the conversation, you must have permission from at least one of the people on the line.Third-Party Recording is Illegal: It is illegal to record a private phone call or conversation between other people if you are not a participant and do not have the consent of at least one of them. Doing so can lead to severe penalties, including felony charges.Intent Matters: The recording must not be made for the purpose of committing an unlawful act, such as blackmail, extortion, or harassment.Interstate Calls: If you are recording a call and the other person is in a state that requires “all-party” (or two-party) consent, that state’s laws may complicate the legality of the recording.

Me and Choppergirl have assumed control of ushpa. Any questions?